In my previous post I acknowledged a striking difference within the interpretation or representation of actual data by two creation scientists.
during this post i would like to think this important subject in additional detail.
In science there are facts, and there's interpretation, and from the primary one follows the opposite .
As humans we've to interpret the info around us to form sense of the planet .
how are interpretations different from facts?
When people are interpreting data, they're assigning aiming to certain abstract objects that are found to be true.
So it's a simple solution to the matter saying that creationists and evolutionists interpret fact differently, then to mention , through their different worldviews.
But that’s a rather simplistic explanation for the main differences in interpretation between those two groups.
But let’s first examine the question what a observation is. A observation originates through application of the methodology .
and that they should be independent from the one that observes that specific fact. So by now you understand that not every fact may be a observation .
By proposing a hypothesis or theory people interpret the facts. therein way it's really clear that creationists interpret data differently than evolutionists.
And it's easy to fall under the fallacy, that each interpretation is allowed that's supported an equivalent data.
And for creationists it's easy to mention that they interpret data through a special worldview and thus stop the discussion that interpretation.
Because there are often competing theories, which are both credible.
And there are often one validated theory and another less sophisticated theory. and eventually there are often one theory during which facts are interpreted by people within the same way again and again.
Is it interpreting the facts during a different way? That’s true. But at an equivalent time it's , and can ever be, an enquiry for the simplest scientific explanation of something that's happening around us.
And once we cannot find another better explanation supported creation, we've to admit that evolution explains it better.
Back to the creation-evolution fact interpretation controversy.
once I see how evolution is sensible of the planet around us, I really do think that evolution explains many phenomena during a better (scientific) way.
Sometimes, using evolutionary assumptions it's less difficult to interpret your data and to form sense of it… that's a minimum of my experience, and that i think that each one creationists should admit that.
But in fact , supported my ideological belief that the world exists only 6000 years, which the Scripture is that the key to the last word Truth, I even have to mention that I don't believe that the Darwinian conception of life is true.
But scientifically speaking I can say, unconditionally, that the sunshine of evolution shines very clearly over a broad range of phenomena.
And my conclusion would be that interpretations in science are different from interpretations that are occurring within the daily world.
But isn't a too easy answer to marginalize the role of ideology within the creation-evolution debate? that's something that i would like to debate during a future post.
An Inference may be a conclusion we come to by analyzing Information. it's inductive reasoning: watching facts then making a conclusion from those facts.
An Interpretation is an Inference from a selected Point of View.
Two people may need an equivalent facts, but with different Points of View, they'll each come to a special solution to the matter .
Conclusions add up of the data; they're the unifying ideas of the research. during a conclusion we discover an answer to the Question in dispute . we've figured it out.
Interpretations and Inferences must be logical. Did you interpret the info correctly? have you ever gone deep enough into the info to unearth the foremost reasonable solution?
Is what you've got come to the simplest solution to the problem? is that this the sole solution possible? Are there other solutions which will not only work, but are better? Which are inconsequential? Could you be wrong?
When we come to an honest conclusion, it’s natural to feel that thinking is completed .
Actually, now we must work even harder and recheck each of the weather of Thought. Any answer invariably leads us to more questions
how are interpretations different from facts?
whenever you think , what happened ??
Let's discuss !!!
Your class are reading a literary composition for a few time. you are feeling that it's now time to guage a particular aspect of the text
– let’s say, how a crucial character has been drawn. You invite the class’s ideas – perhaps you initially give them an opportunity to think alone or discuss in pairs fact and fiction
because the ideas are available thick and fast, you create an inventory or a mind-map on the board.
You probe your students’ responses to enhance the depth of thought. Soon you've got a board covered with ideas.
These include defining adjectives, references to pivotal events, vital quotations and links to the text’s social and historical context.
The mind-map isn't bad, it’s just that … it might are much better if you had just told them within the first place.
Recently, I even have been brooding about whether literary interpretations should be taught as explicit knowledge – within the same way as theories and ideas are in science lessons fact and fiction
This, of course, presents a plethora of thorny problems. Aren’t we each entitled to our own opinion? Aren’t all opinions valid as long as we will back them up? Shouldn’t literature encourage free-thinking in our kids , instead of straightjacket them with the pedantry of their elders?
Putting these complications to at least one side, i made a decision i might put it to the test. Before my lesson on J.B.
Priestley’s Inspector Goole, I picked four of the foremost interesting interpretations of the play’s enigmatic visitor I could find and created a mind-map.
At the beginning of the lesson – as normal – I asked my mixed-ability year 10 class for his or her thoughts on Goole fact and fiction
They touched tangentially on the ideas of ethical conscience and therefore the voice of socialism, also because the predictable he must be a ghost, like ‘ghoul’.
Their ideas were interesting and on the proper track, but not yet fully-formed.
At now , I told them that my role was to require their ideas further by introducing them to a number of the foremost interesting interpretations of Goole I had encountered.
I revealed the diagram below point-by-point, and that we discussed each theory as we went. I gave them time to draw a visible representation of every theory – so on harness the facility of dual-coding.
At the top of the lesson, the category divided into pairs and took it in turns to elucidate each point on the diagram to every other.
By the top of the lesson, every member of this mixed-ability group seemed to understand these theories.
I tested them on their knowledge two days later. that they had retained the meaning of terms like moral epiphany and quasi-religious fact and fiction
Perhaps the foremost interesting moment of the lesson, however, came at the top . A pair had extended upon the thought of Goole as Priestley’s mouthpiece.
that they had decided that the Inspector should be renamed Priestley’s Parrot. His role is to repeat Priestley’s message of social responsibility and compassion into eternity: on stages, in classrooms, yesterday, today and tomorrow fact and fiction
A couple of days later this principle repeated itself. i used to be working with a year 11 student whose teacher had recently given the category a crash program in Freudian theory.
We were watching an episode from The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde when Hyde savagely murders Sir Danvers Carew and is claimed to erupt into ‘a great flame of anger’.
“Perhaps the ‘flame’ may be a metaphor for the way the unconscious can suddenly burst through,” she suggested.
In my opinion, if we would like to encourage critical and out-of-the-box thinking – which we surely do – then we must provide our classes with the tools to try to to so.
If not, then we believe children plucking ideas out of the ether, the tutorial equivalent of alchemy how are interpretations different from facts?
Implemented carefully, the specific teaching of ideas and interpretations needn't be restrictive fact and fiction
Instead, it can induct students within the discipline of the topic and spark genuine insight.
LET'S DISCUSS STORIES :-
Stories are how we add up of events in our lives. We string together a narrative in order that life doesn’t seem entirely random.
In some situations, this is often essential—it’s a fundamental aspect of attribute to hunt meaning. We are a society that makes stories so fast we don’t even know we’re doing it.
Yet our minds don’t limit story-making to those times when it’s helpful for us. We all tell ourselves et al. stories all the time. Often, those stories create pain—and they’re not rooted actually
Observation and Interpretation
In Marshall Rosenberg’s book Nonviolent Communication:
A Language of Life, he talks about learning to separate observations (facts) from interpretations or judgments (stories).
this is often a practice that has not only helped me enormously with inner peace, but also has helped my personal and professional relationships. (That is, once I can remember to try to to it.)
. Interpretations and judgements are the story we create round the facts fact and fiction
These are often positive or negative. Negative stories, perhaps obviously, create pain and inner turmoil; positive stories make us feel good, except (just like the negative) they’re not true. which sets us up for future pain how are interpretations different from facts?
Using one among Rosenberg’s examples, let’s check out a really common story: “She’s selfish.” The observation, during this case, is that “she takes care of her own needs.”
He even claims that there’s a culture during which no word exists for ‘selfish’ because ‘caring for one’s own needs’ is taken into account normal. How radical is that?
Another interpretation could be , “He talks too fast.” That’s not a fact. The observation—the fact—might be, “He speaks so quickly that it’s difficult on behalf of me to know what he’s saying.”
Our interpretations are possible, but as Byron Katie says, it’s always—always—possible to seek out another interpretation that's equally or more true.
In general, we mention how people connect through shared stories. during this definition of the word, however, stories create separation between ourselves et al. , even when our interpretation is positive.
albeit we experience an occasion that creates us desire we’re #winningatlife, that’s a story. The fact, as Rosenberg would say, is that—like all humans—we have a requirement for recognition, and within the moment of that event, our need was met.
Storytelling is, literally, what I do professionally. an inventory of facts is pretty boring to read.
I spent decades writing personal essays that turned fairly mundane facts into compelling and sometimes humorous stories fact and fiction
I’d write on how hilarious or awful or bizarre various situations were. I’d pass judgments on them—often to great effect.
There’s even a book (an excellent one) on writing essays and memoir called things and therefore the Story how are interpretations different from facts?
the 2 are entirely distinct. The story is what our minds tell us about things . once I work with memoir writers, one among the primary things I discuss is that memoir isn't about the events of a story, but rather, the emotional journey underneath.
After I went off medication, i started seeing how spinning facts into stories caused me pain,
especially once I believed i used to be being ignored, or that folks didn’t like me, or that something bad was getting to happen within the future.
I stopped writing essays for 3 full years, so as to coach my mind faraway from creating stories out of facts.
it had been such an automatic behavior on behalf of me that I needed a time-out. I needed to find out , in Rosenberg’s words, to watch instead of interpret.
Let’s say we’ve tried to form plans with a lover 3 times , and every of these times, she has cancelled (fact).
we'd interpret that as, “She doesn’t want to ascertain me.” And while it’s possible that that’s true, that story creates pain—and it isn’t necessarily true.
She may need had deadlines, or her child may need been sick, or her brother came to town unexpectedly, or her husband was abducted by aliens—the point is, without asking directly (and trusting that we’re getting an honest answer), we can’t know needless to say .
Why torture ourselves about something we can’t know?
Because, ego. The ego likes to feel separate and superior, and zip creates separation and superiority quite passing judgment on another person or situation.
Even putting ourselves down may be a sort of ego. We’re passing judgment on our own behavior, or on the essence of who we are and deeming it to be unworthy. Who are we to try to to that?
Social self-deprecation assumes that we’re so awesome that others will inevitably feel bad about themselves if we don’t put ourselves down how are interpretations different from facts?
While genuine humility may be a good thing (she said, making a judgment), as is being considerate (another judgment), we’re not liable for the reactions of others.
This process is what helped me reframe ADHD. instead of believe the story, “I procrastinate” (which I had finished years), I checked out the facts of what was actually happening:
“When I’m not curious about something, my attention moves to something else that does interest me.” There’s no value judgement in there.
People are as they're during this moment. they're going to likely behave differently during a different moment.
Things are as they're . Situations change, because that’s the character of life.
We sleep in a culture of nonstop stories, and in some ways , those stories are important; they assist us find meaning within the world.
Yet stories, judgments and interpretations can turn the mind into a torture instrument. By learning to separate facts from stories, we will find immense peace.
We learn to simply accept people and situations as they're during this moment, because by removing the story, we remove the emotional charge.
When we stop with the stories, drama ceases.
The key to stopping the stories is accepting what's , as it is, and not feeling—consciously or subconsciously—that it should be any different. this will be really, really difficult. The ego loooooooves drama.
It keeps us focused on what’s different about us vs. others, instead of on the commonalities.
Facts, Eckhart Tolle says, are always empowering. things is what it's how are interpretations different from facts?
this is often what must be accepted. If I even have $5 to my name, then that’s a fact to simply accept .
It’s the difference between reacting to a story and responding to a situation.
There was a period of your time once I was ready to separate facts from stories pretty consistently, and honestly, I also found it difficult to work within the social world. Most jokes stopped being funny.
Outrageous things, weren’t. Irony? Gone. I felt immense peace, yet I also felt like I didn’t belong on this planet. Stories, as Robert McKee says, are the currency of human contact.
So the key's to seek out a balance. Learning to separate facts from stories takes practice, and pretty consistent practice at that.
like anything, it’s much easier to ascertain when people are creating stories than once we are.
But over time, we will learn to travel beyond the surface story—metaphorically, the plaster of the photo above—to the facts, or bricks, underneath fact and fiction
One way to start out is to note when we’re feeling a robust emotional reaction, either positive or negative how are interpretations different from facts?
Once we start learning observe thoughts, we will ask, what are we telling ourselves that’s giving rise thereto emotion? Is that a fact, or an interpretation? rather than trying to find a special interpretation which will make us easier , what if we could just sit with the facts as they are?
What’s the Difference Between Fact v. Interpretation…and Why Does It Matter?
What was your first thought once you saw this photo? Did you are feeling a tug on your heart because the girl seems sad or lonely?
Did the scene remind you of something in your childhood? Or did you opt that the girl is expecting someone to arrive and she or he is patiently waiting?
Whatever your first thought, the very fact remains that this is often merely a photograph of a lass staring out a window. Nothing more, nothing less different interpretations of the same thing
In the absence of knowledge , we create meaning.
In the absence of knowledge , our minds are wired to leap in and make a story about what's ahead folks .
It’s the way we protect ourselves, by injecting meaning into data that might rather be without context.
The meaning we attach to data is heavily influenced by our past, our beliefs and our current spirit different interpretations of the same thing
These layers of perspective can ebb and be due moment to moment, causing confusion and disrupting our focus and our relationships.
Has the subsequent ever happened to you?
One morning, once I opened my work emails, I felt a surge of anger as I started reading a message from a colleague.
i used to be responsible of a crucial project, and she or he was offering her unsolicited advice while copying my boss. We had been at odds before since we were on an equivalent level within the company and that we were both ambitious and competitive.
To say that i used to be not happy is an irony different interpretations of the same thing
Instead of taking a flash to calm myself and permit the strong emotion to undergo me (studies show that it takes up to 90 seconds for an emotion to run its course),
I stormed down the hall to her office. i used to be ready for a confrontation and adrenaline was pumping through my body.
My breathing was shallow, my muscles were tense, and my brain was in fight mode different interpretations of the same thing
Fortunately on behalf of me , i used to be stopped by another colleague who was a touch older and who knew me tolerably to ascertain the signs of an impending confrontation different interpretations of the same thing
He pulled me into his office and made me sit down. Without saying a word, he sat behind his desk and took several deep breaths.
I was not close to lose my mojo. I got up to go away , but he motioned on behalf of me to take a seat .
As I checked out him, I found myself mimicking his breathing and felt the charge leave my body. After several seconds, he raised an eyebrow and invited me to share what was happening .
I learned tons that day about myself and therefore the dangers of interpretation.
I avoided a harmful confrontation that might have had potentially drastic consequences on my career different interpretations of the same thing
I also discovered that simply because I felt something strongly doesn't mean that the sensation was accurate. Interrupting the flow of emotions long enough to calmly evaluate things saved me from an embarrassing incident different interpretations of the same thing
You see, there's always thought before the emotion different interpretations of the same thing
Emotions don't rise by themselves. They rise because an idea , belief or interpretation has triggered the emotion different interpretations of the same thing
Let’s put all of this together.
We know that within the absence of knowledge ,
we create our own meaning, supported our worldview (remember the story you created about the small girl within the photograph?). We also know that there's always thought before emotiom different interpretations of the same thing
So what happens once we misinterpret things , motive or event then act on the resulting feeling? It never ends well.
the opposite person doesn't share our worldview and doubtless won't understand the depth of emotion we display. Animosity, mistrust, and conflict are possible results different interpretations of the same thing
Unless we learn to acknowledge once we have entered the zone of emotional reaction, which causes your body to tense and our brain to scream,
“I can’t take this anymore!” Become conscious of your own sequence, interrupt it with mindfulness techniques then reassess things before acting fact vs fiction
I offer personalized meditations and training , also as in-person training (in the Dallas/Fort Worth area) fact vs fiction
Have you ever seen a horror movie or a sad film? If you like it the most, you're ready to "scare" during a horror film by sitting in your seat and creating awareness.
For sad movies, you aim where something is going and it turns you on.
One experience that has been haunting me for years (since I was a child) was the open sea!
Although the sharks sleep in the lake, when we reached the other side of a lake in the area, we were frightened by the underwater stuff fact vs fiction
Thank you for watching my film "JAWS" when I was in elementary school. When the rock plants at the bottom of the lake touch my strength, they will see me swimming in the water like an adult reality vs fiction
Suppose I live in shallow water!
Your brain does not know the difference between imagination and reality fact vs fiction
Coaches often ask their players to perform mentally right before the event. In his book Psycho Cybernetics, D.R.S. In stating this, Maxwell Maltz stated:
"Medical and experimental psychologists have used this veil of skepticism to show that the human nervous system cannot distinguish between 'real' experience and artificial imagination. And instinctive".
So when you get a presentation later, take your audience on the road reality vs fiction
Share a story to help keep your proposal "alive". They will forget what you said, but they will always remember how you feel about them reality vs fiction
24-hour news broadcasts, citizen journalism, and the increasing reliance on social media as reliable sources have had a profound impact not only on how we get our news, but also on it reality vs fiction
We use resources. of information. Data share information about ways to diagnose and interact with others in online communities.
When these issues, including the "fake news" industry that intentionally spreads fake stories intended to go viral, educators have to come up with an alternative and empowering scenario reality vs fiction
This book will help you face these new realities fact vs fiction
Teach fake news strategies, including news ranking models with resource links to include fake news in your show reality vs fiction
Key examples (introductory, intermediate and advanced announcements) that show how to handle fake news with students and peers.
Readers reviewed Fake News with its own digital component to evaluate its ability to detect and deal with fake news reality vs fiction
A downloadable infographic is available with Mobile Media Education reality vs fiction
Fact vs. Fiction provides students with information about the equipment they not only carry in college, but also keeps it in their pockets and bags fact vs fiction
In every investigation, plan, or delivery, we uncover the most important element of human truth, explain practical principles, and compensate for relevant stories and experiences that are relevant to the context.
We visited Allied World Shakers, a team selected for their creative, strategic and productive skills and many classroom experiences reality vs fiction
The Reality and Imagination team is passionate, agile and creative and determined to solve business problems efficiently fact vs fiction
With calm leadership in customer service, our diverse talent pool brings together strategists, designers, writers, editors and producers who combine creativity and business reality vs fiction
We love rocks and there is something about sitting in the shadow of many mountains that keeps us (relatively) defenseless reality vs fiction
But it is often far from our first radio station. With our team, you will have access to the values of large agencies (such as Stella Artways, US Bank, Starbucks, and Estée Lauder) and smaller agencies (such as respect, transparency, and acceptance).
We find that it is better than two worlds, as fate is an intersection where facts meet imagination fact vs fiction